By Editor
An Abuja- based Non-governmental, and non-profit organization-Advocate of Law and Human Dignity has added its voice to the ongoing debate over the proposed national protest by aggrieved youths against the biting economic hardship in the country.
In a press statement signed by Barrister Adebanji Dada, Abuja based legal practitioner said;
“As Nigeria faces economic hardship and social unrest, a proposed protest has ignited debate on citizens’ right to dissent. While the Constitution guarantees peaceful assembly, it is crucial to acknowledge its limitations and potential consequences.
“Amid rising inflation, unemployment, and poverty, the protest seems justified. However, there are concerns about violence and chaos. Constructive dialogue, not protests, is essential for addressing grievances and driving national development.” he noted.
He further advised and called for building a better Nigeria through peaceful and constructive means.
His words; “The Nigeria’s constitution guarantees the right to freedom of assembly, allowing citizens to protest peacefully. This right is essential in a democracy enabling citizens to hold their leaders accountable and demand change.
“However, this right is not absolute, it is subject to limitations to ensure public safety, maintain law and order and protect the rights of others. The government has a responsibility to balance individual rights with the greater good” he noted.
Justifying the protest, Barr. Dada goes further; “In this context, the proposed protest may seem like a justified response, however there are warning signals that unscrupulous elements plan to hijack the protests, perpetuating illegalities and unleashing violence which could lead to chaos, destruction of property and loss of lives”
According to him; “Rather than resorting to to protest which could turn down the country, the organizers’ demand can be addressed through dialogue. The government should engage with the protesters, listen to their grievances and work towards finding solutions”
He advised the government to among other things: “Refrain from making threats against those planning to engage in the protests. Such threats could escalate tensions and undermine efforts to achieve peaceful resolutions. Constructive engagement, rather than intimidation is the path forward” he concluded.
